READING BY PLANETS
The elections of 09-08-2020 resulted in an 80-20 type political pareto invariant likely to make Sviatlana Tiskanoukaya believe that she had obtained 80% of the votes. Moreover, in her interview with Tut.by on September 10, 2020 she said "I have a country behind me". A false impression.
Why did Belarusian intelligence exile him on August 10 to Lithuania? With the agreement of Lithuania? We learned on August 11, 2020 that Sviatlana was emigrating to Vilnius, with her two children, for safety, in order to continue the political fight, because the confrontation had been defined since May 29, 2020, during the arrest of her husband Sergkey in Grodno. , with his "country for life" band including Ihar Losik.
At that time I did not know the date of Sviatlana's birth and I was observing. Every Sunday there were huge demonstrations in Minsk of more than 2000 people. The first information cited the Coordination Committee with names that will become famous: Masha the musician, Maxim Znack the lawyer, we talked less about Sergey and the conditions of his arrest in Grodno. Sviatlana was the center of attention for routing Lukasencko. A housewife, mother of 2 children, announced a new wind. We will learn more, in June 2021 that one of his children is disabled, his eldest son, when Lukasencko decided to cut him a monthly social allowance. The tape in Sviatlana featured a Nobel Prize in Literature. Little by little, the flow of the Coordination Council was enriched by foreign contributions, including VIASNA for human rights and the help provided by Maria Kolesnikova of the incarcerated banker Victar Barbaryka.
a hope of renewal was germinating in the East. Every Sunday on twitter was the occasion to follow this germination live during clashes with the sinister ohmons of the tyrant Lukasencko. His armed bodyguard and his multiple arbitrary arrests. The women of Belarus showed courage and stubbornness in demonstrating and defying the police. In the number appeared Nina Barginskaya, the "grandmother of the Revolution in progress" who was not then known to classify. She was opposed to power.
Then the events went quickly. On September 6 and 7, 2020 Masha was kidnapped in the middle of the street, then Maxim Znack the lawyer, at his office. The stock exchange watch indicated that the Belarusian ruble lost 1 cent every week. Calls to strike ruined the economy and threatened the currency.
Refusing the forced eviction Masha jumped out of the moving automobile leading her to Ukraine, then tore up her passport. derisory defense to oppose the force, Minsk could remake the passport without difficulty. Crossing the border without papers was proving difficult. From this episode there remains a trace of Masha's patriotism in the heart of Minsk.
threats appeared pointing to the difficulties of the winter. Viatlana disassociated herself from the people. Elena Levencko the sportswoman denounced the mastery of prisoners. Silence from Sviatlana on the subject. The jails complained about Levencko's public criticism, saying there was no need to complain. Public opinion relayed Elena's criticisms. Lukasencko's curse was strewn with oil. The Minsk Prosecutor was weakened without reaction. Sviatlana was still silent. The street people no longer followed the Coordination Committee. In the people of Belarus a break was occurring. The egoist Sviatlana could not be counted on. What was her plan? It will not be discovered until October that her husband Serghey was in distress, Morale breakdown. Ishar Losik his companion began a media hunger strike. It was then that the European Commission refused to recognize the election of August 9th. It was the start of the sanctions against Minsk
At that time there was a political discussion in Vilnius: when did the women of Belarus keep marching in the streets with BCHB flags in the colors of the Vytys rider? Some diplomats thought yes, others thought it would stop. No one had imagined Putin's intervention to put an end to these public demonstrations. No more repressive texts, and no more punishments. Justice then came to strengthen the ohmon militia. The repression was animated: the judges sanctioned as auxiliaries of the police power. Of course Sviatlana remained without reactions, without denouncing either the excesses or the abuses. the only people sanctioned suffered all the outrages. It was in these conditions that Sviatlana gradually lost the street. one after the other, the protest parades became scarce. It was then that Sviatlana made two mistakes: on October 26, 2020, she called the country to a general strike, without being clearly followed. Then she let Joseph Borrel's European Commission impose economic sanctions. Naievement Sviatlana wanted new elections believing to have with them the adhesion of the country. A mistake. The country was not following her. It was not the right way to negotiate with Lukasancko. At Grodno Serghey was losing more and more. He no longer represented anything.
Then came the water cut in the middle of winter in Norrava Borraya. It was then that Eléna Lechvencko again appeared in public. She was not prosecuted for her public reaction. Sviatlana saw this case from too far away, without reacting
The winter of 2020-2021 was terrible. In the spring the power of Minsk sought provocation by calling for actions of popular protest. Too weakened, Sviatlana hardly mobilized beyond the ranks of the diaspora. 20 people maximum when every Sunday it mobilized 2000 people spontaneously. The Coordination Council had no more forces. It was then that Pavel Latuscko had theHow do you know who the new players are? Russia posited as a preliminary that any sanction definitively closed the negotiations with Minsk. However, the European Commission believed that the interest of the people of Belarus lay in the fear of sanctions. It was first of all the end of the EBRD's loans to the Minsk economy, a net loss of European funding. The only other form of funding is Schengen visas and IOM aid. the migration office. In this regard, Moscow strongly advised Minsk at the end of June 2021 during the Ryanair hack. No media noted that Schengen, signed at the end of December 2019 by Minsk, required an act, because Lukasencko's word alone on May 29 was worthless. Minsk had signed with Europe. On July 13, 2021, during the meeting with Putin in Saint Petersburg, Lukasencko did not know which side to take. There was total silence on the signed agreements. On this occasion Joseph Borrel's European Commission followed the Kremlin's maneuver. No reminder of the signed treaty, nor of the obligations undertaken. Both Minsck and Moscow sell Schengen visas to Russian and Belarusian tourists. Navalny abandoned this controversial subject likely to put Moscow in difficulty. in Vilnius Linas Linkevius also made the diplomatic impasse. For Europe, Sviatlana demanded new elections controlled by the OSCE. Believing she would win the election. A meaningless debate. imperceptibly replaced by economic sanctions. This is how Sviatlana became Madame Pitt bull sanctions until the fierceness of July 28 with the demands made to Biden in the Iranian format. reflex to create the NAU, in order to launch personal actions outside of Sviatlana.
Sviatlana no longer saw that Luckasencko was visibly aging. Two new partners had appeared: Putin's Russia and Joseph Borrel's European Commission. Sviatlana got lost in the twists and turns of unnecessary Sanctions.
How do you know who the new players are? Russia posited as a preliminary that any sanction definitively closed the negotiations with Minsk. However, the European Commission believed that the interest of the people of Belarus lay in the fear of sanctions. It was first of all the end of the EBRD's loans to the Minsk economy, a net loss of European funding. The only other form of funding is Schengen visas and IOM aid. the migration office. In this regard, Moscow strongly advised Minsk at the end of June 2021 during the Ryanair hack. No media noted that Schengen, signed at the end of December 2019 by Minsk, required an act, because Lukasencko's word alone on May 29 was worthless. Minsk had signed with Europe. On July 13, 2021, during the meeting with Putin in Saint Petersburg, Lukasencko did not know which side to take. There was total silence on the signed agreements. On this occasion Joseph Borrel's European Commission followed the Kremlin's maneuver. No reminder of the signed treaty, nor of the obligations undertaken. Both Minsck and Moscow sell Schengen visas to Russian and Belarusian tourists. Navalny abandoned this controversial subject likely to put Moscow in difficulty. in Vilnius Linas Linkevius also made the diplomatic impasse. For Europe, Sviatlana demanded new elections controlled by the OSCE. Believing she would win the election. A meaningless debate. imperceptibly replaced by economic sanctions. This is how Sviatlana became Madame Pitt bull sanctions until the fierceness of July 28 with the demands made to Biden in the Iranian format.
Compare if necessary the two responses of Lukasancko to the sanctions against Belarus in terms of exports. In July 2020 Kauno.Diena.lt published a list of projects to be carried out for belarus including financial investments in port infrastructure. In 2021, a shorter response from Putin. Stopping Lithuanian trains will cost Vilnius more than stopping Belarusian exports. A statement of fact. A talk of debt replaces investments. Zero-sum games for two countries, contrary to their commercial interests. The European Commission will be forced to remove sanctions, even if it means disavowing Sviatlana.
When did Putin take control of Luckasencko? It was during the accidental death of Roman Bondarencko on November 12, 2020. Usually Lusckasancko speaks in bad Belarusian gibberish. This time he was shouting that Roman was drunk, and that Minsk had eliminated a nocturnal drunk. Putin immediately understood that this affair required close control: in particular the journalists responsible for reporting it. They had to be ruled out because the published reports indicated the victim's sobriety, which gave rise to public protests called zero PMM. No traces of alcohol in the blood. The case went back to the Swedish Attorney General of Minsk A.Shvied. Luchasencko ages quickly and badly. His memory is no longer sure. Everything must be checked as a precaution. It was therefore in mid November 2020 that the putting under control of Luchasencko by Putin took place. The accidental murder of Roman attracted attention. A state affair. It was difficult to recognize a gratuitous murder at night in Minsk. Tut by journalists were doomed in advance. Political prisoners.
After a trying winter punctuated by preventive stays, followed by criminal hearings, and convictions of 15 days and more, came May 23, 2021 with the Ryanair piracy case.
A rather particular story. In its Lithuanian version, quite incomprehensible, it is reported that the Rayanair pilot was the NEXTA responsible. Then the BNS text manages to squeeze the threat of blowing up the plane, without anyone understanding when. One thing is certain: the participation of a Russian mig in order to put pressure on the landing conditions. Where the stories turn sour are the conditions ordered to stop the aircraft in Minsk, and the ban on returning to Vilnius. For these reasons it will be necessary to reread the testimonials of the passengers. Because the threat to blow up the plane looks like a formal notice from classic espionage. The source of the message was found in Switzerland On a database. Strange. All these inconsistencies, including the disorder of the sequence shots, point to one and the same source: Russia. The Mig was Russian, not Belarusian. It appears that Putin is involved in this act of air piracy. It will be necessary to reread the report scheduled for November 2021 in order to follow the successive phases of this incredible episode. For several months, Putin and Lukasencko have been playing provocateurs. But other dates also appear. The judicial repression did not foresee the suicide of Stépan Shapylov in full hearing, nor the development, by President Nauseda, of Lithuania of the totally crazy concept of the so-called "hybrid" attack, without coupling with a animal.
In Brest, a Russian was sentenced to one and a half years in prison for a tweet "slandering Lukashenko" reports VIASNA on September 20, 2021.
In Brest, a Russian was sentenced to one and a half years in prison for a tweet "slandering Lukashenko"
A court hearing on Sunday is both rare and suspicious. The reason for the criminal case, it will be recalled, was a tweet from Irina w on May 23, 2021 in reference to her article in LiveJournal. The entire publication was a complete reprint of a BBC Russian service article on the incident involving the Ryanair plane on which Protasevich was a passenger. Irina, was arrested on May 28 after coming to Belarus, for an interview, the subject of which is unknown, at the Department of Citizenship and Migration. His rental apartment was searched, and his laptop was seized. The woman was placed in the IVS, then transferred to the pre-trial detention center in Brest, where she remained in preventive detention from June 1 to August 5, 2021 without knowing the real reasons.
The woman, following this abuse of authority, was declared guilty, and sentenced to one and a half years in a colony of the general regime for unknown reasons. This strange affair raises several questions. In particular on the limits of the freedom of opinion, and expression, recognized to the Russian citizens in Belarus in the Constitution.
If this abuse is true, because taken up including by Franack Viacorka adviser of Sviatlana, with the title "crazy". This means that the right to criticize is prohibited although the Constitution of Belarus allows it. We can therefore understand the political dead ends in which the Coordination Council is floundering. It was under these conditions that the summer of 2021 was announced: the closure of the European sky to summer tourist traffic, including the Russian company aeroflot. Putin was compromised, forced not to negotiate flights to Russia. But another summer propaganda dossier was also looming: the canard of snobbish Lithuanian President Nauseda: the delusional concept of so-called hybrid attacks without animal coupling. An essential requirement for the use of the word hybrid. Kept off the subject of information, Sviatlana was only concerned with her visit to Biden organized for her by Judith Fisher, a diplomat appointed to Belarus without a visa-free stay. Which explains why the winner of the summer was Pavel Latuscko, in the case of the belarusian sprinter Tismanovkaya. For which he found a Polish welcome during the day after his forced recall to Minsk. Without Pavel this athlete was lost and it was a shame. He also obtained the transfer of a rider from Belarus to Poland. thanks to its diplomatic networks. Pavel watched as Sviatlana indulged in his selfishness. This explains the difficulties of Sviatlana to regain a foothold in the news. Not even a word for the convictions of Victar Barbarika to 14 years in prison as well as those of Maxim Znak and Masha to 11 and 10.5 years in camp.
For inexplicable as well as unexplained reasons Sviatlana stayed away from the debate on the renewal of the Russian parliament in the Duma of September 17, 2021. Yet it was an electoral opportunity to count on the ground by supporting a party, without necessarily providing support. to Navalny, if only to the Communist Party?
The lack of political prospects of the couple Sviatlana and Sergey, in Belarus, makes the survival of the Coordination Committee even more difficult by threatening its future. What support for Vilnius in 2022? President Nauseda was contested on August 10, in the street, for his Covid vaccination policy. Kept out of the Belarusian migrant file, Sviatlana has no political message to deliver to the public. We will note the return of Elena Levchencko on September 17, 2021 in a campaign in favor of athletes from Belarus, in order to support swimming champion Guerassiminia, with a black "free belarus" t-shirt. Is the future of Belarus with Elena Levchenkco? awaiting the announcement of Lukasancko's death that occurred at night?